|
Post by mcf on Mar 5, 2011 21:49:50 GMT
Hi Kirsten,
Thanks. 6 essays to go and then dissertations tomorrow.
Hope this helps. ;D
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 6, 2011 19:30:04 GMT
“A comparative study of the social class divides in three Dickens’ novels – Hard Times, Great Expectations and Oliver Twist – and how he highlights the cruelty of humanity.”
“It is a society where the material conditions of life indicates a social position, where money defines opportunity, where social class enforce a powerful sense of stratification, yet where chances for class mobility exist”excellent quotation - does it mention the Victorian era anywhere in it? Remember you will also need to footnote this.
Writers have often been seen to depict great conflict between those of differing social statuses in their pieces set during the Victorian era. This is evident throughout Charles Dickens’ work, including his novels ‘Great Expectations’, ‘Oliver Twist’ and ‘Hard Times’. ;D Throughout these suchexpression error novels, Dickens illustrates the unjust nature of the inequality between differing social classes. ;D He questions the way in which the measure of one’s wealth and refinement defines our character and life.this sentence feels like it is unfinished as it seems like a statement and doesn't naturally link into the next one. Furthermore, he queriesis this a strong enough word? the morality and sincerity of those in varying social circumstances, and the detrimental effect the inheritanceis this just specific to one text? of vast amounts of money can have. This can be seen none more clearly, than in ‘Great Expectations.’ The protagonist, Pip, is shown to embark upon a journey of great social conquest.is conquest the most approrpiate word in this context? Having been presented with the opportunity to become educated and increase his social standing, Pip leaves his family behind in search of a life of wealth and prosperity. ;DThe happiness he wished to attain in such a life remains absent, and it is clear that Pip’s sense of morality decreases as his social status escalates. ;D The novel ‘Oliver Twist’, encapsulates the life of a young boy, Oliver, who has been born into grave social circumstances. Having been left with no family, the novel depicts Oliver’s search for his place in life. He initially appears most suited among his fellow working class citizens, however, ultimately his morality and honourable sole allow for him to ascend the social ladder, and become an upper class citizen. This is excellent ;D‘Hard Times’ demonstrates Dickens questioning the integrity of the upper class and illustrating the good hearted nature of the working class. In ‘Hard Times’ the upper class inhabitants of Coketown attempt to educate the citizens in practicality and in learning facts. However, this stern, inhuman attitude results in the upbringing of unfeeling children who are left unable to show emotion or love. Lacking such a fundamental part of their lives, the upper class citizens must accept that they must follow the lead of the working class and learn how to be compassionate. Throughout these three novels, Dickens investigates the social divide between different classes during the Victorian era and highlights the cruelty of human nature. ;DThis is fabulous ;D
In the novel ‘Great Expectations’ the differing social status of characters is illustrated through setting and their contrasting homessounds a little too mechanical.. Pip is depictedis it depicted or represent - one or the other - not both. to represent the working class – housed in confined accommodation with his sister and her husband (Mr and Mrs Joe). “Joe’s forge adjoined our house, which was a wooden house.” Joe must work studiouslynot the best word in this context. in the forge, doing manual labour, in order to provide for his family and ensure their survival. In conjunction with this, Pip’s humble home, and lack of affluence underline his family’s poor social standing. They live in a desolate village, surrounded by marsh lands – a poor foundation upon which to build a prosperous life. This conveys very bleak prospects for Pip’s future, if he remains among the working class society. ;D This desolate atmosphere is further illustrated throughreference to the author the use of pathetic fallacy. “The rains were heavy... the sky was just a row of long angry red lines and dense black lines intermixed.” Through this dark description, Dickens successfully uses pathetic fallacy to create a dismal atmosphere – foreshadowing the introduction of Pip’s pitiful, working class life.This is a little thin - neverending?
Conversely, Miss Havisham’s home, ‘Satis House’ represents the upper class lifestyle, and symbolises Pip’s romantic perception of the aristocratic societHow? Outwith the name of the house how else is the grand nature shown?y. ;D The house is initially depicted to be of great grandeur – reflecting Miss Havisham’s affluence. The name ‘Satis House’ epitomises the superficialityexpression error of the upper class. ‘Satis’, to mean ‘enough’, represents the way in which the house is supposed to provide great satisfaction, and in owning it, you will wish for no more. However, upon taking a closer look inside the house, the true nature of Miss Havisham’s lifestyle is unveiled. ;D “No glimpse of daylight was to be seen it.” The setting of ‘Satis House’ is depicted to be grim and uninviting. The house is shown to be dark, and a pitiful representation of the grand home it once was. Having been abandoned by her husband on her wedding day, Miss Havisham is left traumatised and bitter - unable to move forward with her life. In her refusal to accept the passage of time, her house too suffers. It lies dormant – its majestic structure decaying with its extreme lack of attention. The deteriorating state of Miss Havisham’s house and her mental state are the first suggestions to Pip that materialistic values and riches are not the key to a content, prosperous life.Kirsten, this is excellent - really insightful and detailed. I am very impressed. In that Miss Havisham was left by a fiancé who merely wished to marry so as to inherit her money, Dickens illustrates the gluttonous values that can be acquired after being exposed to the upper class lifestyle. He foreshadows the lesson Pip must learn about the detrimental effects of possessing excessive amounts of money and being amongst such a refined society. Having visited Satis House, Pip is no longer content with his home, and longs to be of the same social standing as Miss Havisham – illustrating his naivety towards his belief that with money, comes the attainment of complete happiness.The section prior to this insertion needs structured - work on paragraphing.
As in ‘Great Expectations’, Dickens carefully constructs the setting in ‘Oliver Twist’ so as to illustrate the division between those of differing social statuses ;D. In the opening line of ‘Oliver Twist’, the setting of the workhouse is immediately established.I would insert a quotation here there needs to be greater fluency here as the link between the two sentences is too implicit.Through the description of Oliver’s birth taking place at the work house, it instantly conveys his working class status.insert quotation He is shown to have been born into a life of misery and misfortune, having lost his mother and been forced to live in the work house. The work house is depicted to be a greatly desolate placeinsert quotation here - remember you don't always need tyo analyse each quotation - just use it to support what you have said and then reference it - footnoting., where naive children, such as Oliver, are forced to endure wholly unjust circumstances. They are provided with minimal amounts of food, as the workhouse owner, Mrs Mann, wishes to keep their money and entitlements for herself. The unfair treatment, received by Oliver Twist at the work house, conveys a very bleak atmosphere and underlines the miserable circumstances endured by the working class. ;DSo as to heighten the impact of the conditions, the city in which the work house is located remains nameless – thus not detracting from the harsh circumstances endured at the work house. I feel this is insightful and interesting but you just add it on at the end of the paragraph like an after thought - you need to make more of this as it is a decent point.
To further illustrate[bthis is a very mechanical and methodical link - needs greater fluency.][/b] the poor living conditions the working class were forced to tolerate, Dickens depicts Small sliver of wood generally used in fire-makingin’s home to be greatly inadequate.The sentence prior to this insertion is rather confusing. Throughout ‘Oliver Twist’, Dickens illustrates the difference between the moral working class citizens who work diligently and honestly in attempt to earn a living, and the immoral, people of working class status, who thieve as a means of survival ;D. Small sliver of wood generally used in fire-makingin falls into the latter category, and furthermore, enrols many naive children to steal for him. He houses these such children, with himself, in a secluded house, concealed from society. It is described to be located in a grim area, and hidden up a flight of stairs – so as to be inconspicuous and discreet. When first entering the home, Oliver is forced to confront the reality of their living conditions. “The walls and ceiling of the room were perfectly black with age and dirt.” The setting of this refuge for the outlaws highlights the secluded life they are forced to lead due to their illegal methods of survival. ;D In choosing to thieve in order to survive, they are forced to live a life of secrecy – segregating themselves from the rest of society. Through both these settings, Dickens demonstrates the dismal living conditions the working class were forced to endure no matter how honourably they conducted themselves. you need to look at this in more detail.
To act as a contrastlacks fluency in linking. to the living conditions of the working class, the setting of Mr Brownlow’s home is used to represent should it not just read represents the...the lifestyle of the aristocratic society. His house is described to be an iconic London home of the upper classquotation inserted here.. It is grand, with multiple floors, majestic paintings hung on the wall, and employed servants to attend to Mr Brownlow’s needs. This underlines the ease of life for a member of the superior social class. Through the depiction of this setting, Dickens further illustrates the divide between the Mr Brownlow and Oliver and Small sliver of wood generally used in fire-makingin; the upper class, and the working class.
What is the link? Make your line of thought clearer.Through the setting of Coketown in ‘Hard Times’, Dickens once again conveys the inequality between different social class. The town and its inhabitants are depicted to be greatly practical and industrious. “It was a town of machinery and tall chimneys, out of which interminable serpents of smoke trailed themselves forever and ever, and never got uncoiled. It had a black canal in it, and a river that ran purple.” ;D The town appears very mechanical? and artificial – lacking in human emotion and character. ;D It is a town built purely for purpose and profit - not for enjoyment, nor creativity. However, in such an industrious environment, only the owners of factories are prosperous and may enjoy the benefits of such industries. Characters such as Mr Bumble are shown to relish receiving the great profits of his business, whilst continuing paying his workers such an unethical amount that they struggle to survive. ;DEvidently only the upper class may thrive in such an industrious environment, whilst the working class have no hope of prosperity. Thus, through the setting of Coketown, Dickens successfully highlights segregation between differing social classes.
Kirsten, this is excellent - the only problem you will have with this dissertation is word count. That is a good problem to have. Very impressed by your work.
Hope this helps. ;D
|
|
|
Post by kirsten (: on Mar 16, 2011 21:40:56 GMT
word count is definitely not an issue with this chapter, but i'm fairly sure that's a good thing cause characterisation is going to be a bigggieeee i was just wondering, in the first chapter i've done great expos, oliver and then hard times, should i do i keep it in this order or does it matter if i've done great expos, hard times and then oliver?
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 16, 2011 21:54:53 GMT
Hi Kirsten,
That is not a problem. Also don't worry about narrative style - it will be great. I have faith.
Hope this helps. ;D
|
|
|
Post by kirsten (: on Mar 21, 2011 21:43:25 GMT
i actually feel like crying for you in that you are going to have to try and read/make sense of this pile of crap
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 21, 2011 22:19:36 GMT
Hi Kirsten,
Don't stress. Your dissertation will be great. I have genuine faith in you.
Hope this helps. ;D
|
|
|
Post by kirsten (: on Mar 22, 2011 22:16:37 GMT
okay, i'm sorry this is so late, seriously struggled with this chapter, wasn't particularly sure what i was trying to say for half of it, so have fun reading it!
Chapter 2: Narrative style..
The narrative style used by Dickens allows him to further illustrate the divide between the characters of varying social classes in his novels. In Great Expectations, the story is told from the perspective of the protagonist – Pip. This presents the reader with a firsthand view into Pip’s social advances and a greater insight into the transformation he experiences. In that he narrates the novel, his emotions and opinions are heavily conveyed throughout – communicating his opinion of others and his longing for a life of greater social standing. He is initially shown to be content with his home life and thankful for his brother in law describing him as “a mild, good-natured, sweet-tempered, easy-going, foolish, dear fellow.” This depiction of Joe illustrates Pip’s once compassionate demeanour and contently naive perception of his family. However, after visiting Miss Havisham’s home, Pip becomes intent with ascending the social hierarchy and consequently grows ashamed of his family and Joe’s illiterate, inept manner. After moving to London in search of the life he so greatly sought after, Pip is mortified when he learns of Joe’s intentions to visit him.
“Let me confess exactly, with what feelings I looked forward to Joe’s coming. Not with pleasure, I was bound to him by so many ties; no; with considerable disturbance, some mortification, and a keen sense of incongruity. If I could have kept him away by paying him, I certainly would.”
Pip is evidently ashamed on Joe’s common and unrefined ways, and therefore wishes to dissociate himself from Joe and his former life. The cruel way in which he describes his apprehension towards Joe’s visit underlines his diminishing morality as his social status increases. He has allowed himself to become consumed by the superficiality of the upper class – conveyed through the superior manner in which he treats Joe. Moreover, he states that if possible he would use money to keep Joe away - highlighting his ignorance towards the fact that money will not banish all his problems. Pip’s treatment of Joe demonstrates Dickens’ use of pathos as he appeals for the reader’s sympathy for Joe. Through this use of pathos, Dickens further underlines Pip’s change in character, in that Pip’s admiration of Joe has descended into shameful embarrassment. Through the novel being depicted from Pip’s perspective, it allows a more clear insight into his change in character. Through his narration, his changed perspective of life is more clearly illustrated and consequently his social ascent can be more clearly seen.
Conversely, Hard Times is recounted by an omniscient narrator, so as to illustrate the varying moral values held by different social classes. Through the omniscient narrator, the lives of the various characters are depicted from an unbiased perspective. The true nature of characters is therefore unveiled, rather than merely the facade they put across to other characters in the novel. Stephen, an employee at Mr Bounderby’s factory, can be identified as working class citizen with great moral integrity. After a disagreement with his colleagues he is left an outcast - no longer a welcome member among the team at the factory. Bounderby seizes this opportunity to gain an insight into the lives of his workers. When Stephen refuses to reveal to Bounderby, information about his former companions, his moral conscience is highlighted.
“He had not spoken out of his own will and desire; and he felt it in his heart a noble return for his late injurious treatment, to be faithful to those who had repudiated him.”
Stephen chose not to defend his colleagues because he wanted to, but merely because it was the morally just action to take. Despite having been subjected, by his associates, to a enivronment in which he was segregated from the other workers, he remained ethically righteous, because it was a quality born unto him. Conversely, through Bounderby’s inquisition, he demonstrates his deficient moral understanding. When Stephen withholds the information he longs for, his bitter, unethical character is highlighted.
“Even your own Union, the men who know you best, will have nothing to do with you... I’ll have nothing to with you either.”
Through the omniscient narration, it is assured Bounderby’s reaction is coming from an unbiased perspective is therefore entirely accurate. In Stephen’s refusal to present Bounderby with the information he sought after, he does the morally right thing, rather than catering to the pompous character’s custom of attaining whatever he wants. Bounderby’s decision to fire him when he does so, contrasts with Stephen’s display of morality, and thus demonstrates his lacking sense in ethical judgement. His cruel treatment of Stephen once again illustrates Dickens’ use of pathos, as he prompts the audience to empathise with the moral, working class. The omniscient narration allows for a distinct insight into both characters of differing social classes, and defines the upper class (Mr Bounderby) as the villain, and the working class (Stephen) as the honourable victim.
Oliver Twist is, too, narrated from an omniscient perspective in order to allow greater insight into the lives of varying characters. The omniscient perspective allows the lives of all characters to be revealed, rather than the story being confined to the viewpoint of one individual. Consequently, the divide between the rich and poor is further highlighted as the hardships endured by the working class are contrasted with the ease of life for the aristocratic society. From a young age, Oliver was told he was destined for a life of illegitimate affairs and sinful actions. When he was no more than a mere child, an upper class gentleman outlined his view on Oliver’s life prospects by simply stating:
“That boy will be hung.”
Through the omniscient perspective, the reader is not restricted to the viewpoint of the protagonist, and consequently the harsh opinions of the lower class are unveiled. As a working class member of society Oliver is branded as a callous character by the upper class, and is, in their eyes, undoubtedly destined to become an outlaw who will ultimately be hung for his sins. Dickens ridicules the uppity gentleman, through mocking their indignation at Oliver asking for more food. He describes Oliver’s actions to be an “impious and profane offence.” Through this sarcastic description, Dickens conveys the ridiculous nature of the upper class’ attitude towards those of a lesser social status. Through Oliver’s treatment, the social prejudices the working class were subjected to, are thoroughly highlighted. In conjunction with the upper class’ opinion of the working class being conveyed, Oliver’s opinion concerning the lifestyle of the aristocrats is also unveiled through the omniscient perspective. Having endured the hardship of staying in treacherous housing, Oliver is amazed by Mr Brownlow’s lifestyle.
“Everything was so quiet, and neat, and orderly; everybody was kind and gentle; that after the noise and turbulence in the midst of which he had always lived, it seemed like Heaven itself.”
Oliver evidently shows great gratitude for being granted permission to stay in Mr Brownlow’s home – a quality he was accused many times, by the upper class, not to possess. Mr Brownlow is depicted to a live a life of ease and stability – greatly contrasting with Oliver’s unpredictable lifestyle. The adoration Oliver feels for Mr Brownlow differs immensely from the upper class’ superior attitude towards the working class. Through the omniscient perspective in Oliver Twist, Dickens conveys the differing existences experience by those of varying social status, and their attitudes towards one another.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 23, 2011 7:39:21 GMT
okay, i'm sorry this is so late, seriously struggled with this chapter, wasn't particularly sure what i was trying to say for half of it, so have fun reading it!
Chapter 2: Narrative style..
Should open with - preferably using secondary research but either way a few lines about the influence and power and influence etc that narrative style has over our understanding and appreciation etc lof literature.The what is the style?narrative style used by Dickens allows him to further illustrate the divide between the characters of varying social classes in his novels. the expression before this insertion is too wordy.In Great Expectations, the story is told from the perspective of the protagonist – Pip.Are you saying it is written in the first person? This presents the reader with a firsthand view into Pip’s social advances and a greater insight into the transformation he experiences. In that he expression errornarrates the novel, his emotions and opinions are heavilydon't need heavily conveyed throughout – communicating his opinion of others and his longing for a life of greater social standing. He is initially shown to be content with his home life and thankful for his brother in law describing him as “use the quotation correctly so thetreis reference to the first person.a mild, good-natured, sweet-tempered, easy-going, foolish, dear fellow.” This depiction of Joe illustrates Pip’s once compassionate demeanour and contently naivecontently naive? perception of his family. However, after visiting Miss Havisham’s home, Pip becomes intent with ascending the social hierarchy and consequently grows ashamed of his family and Joe’s illiterate, inept manner. After moving to London in search of the life he so greatly sought after, Pip is mortified when he learns of Joe’s intentions to visit him.
“Let me confess exactly, with what feelings I looked forward to Joe’s coming. Not with pleasure, I was bound to him by so many ties; no; with considerable disturbance, some mortification, and a keen sense of incongruity. If I could have kept him away by paying him, I certainly would.” ;D
Pip is evidently ashamed on Joe’s common and unrefined ways, and therefore wishes to dissociate himself from Joe and his former life. The cruel way in which he describes his apprehension towards Joe’s visit underlines his diminishing morality as his social status increases. He has allowed himself to become consumed by the superficiality of the upper class – conveyed through the superior manner in which he treats Joe. Moreover, he states that if possible he would use money to keep Joe away - highlighting his ignorance towards the fact that money will not banish all his problems.
New ParagraphPip’s treatment of Joe demonstrates Dickens’ use of pathos as he appeals forexpression error the reader’s sympathy for Joe. Through this use of pathosdevelop a deeper understanding of why authors / dranatists etc wish to create this and why it is approrpriate., Dickens further underlines Pip’s change in character, in that Pip’s admiration of Joe has descended into shameful embarrassment. Through the novel being depicted from Pip’s perspectivesentence before this insertion is too wordy., it allows a moreexpression error clear insight into his change in charactertoo wordy.. Through his narration, his changed perspective of life is more clearly illustrated and consequently his social ascent can be more clearly seen.What are the negatives to merely seeing things from Pip's persepctive?
Conversely, Hard Times is recounted by an omniscient narrator, so as to illustrate the varying moral values held by different social classes. Through thecreation of an omniscient narrator, the lives of the various characters are depicted from an unbiased perspective. The true nature of characters is therefore unveiled, rather than merely the facade they put across to other characters in the novel. Stephen, an employee at Mr Bounderby’s factory, can be identified as working class citizen with great moral integrity. After a disagreement with his colleagues he is left an outcast - no longer a welcome member among the team at the factory. Bounderby seizes this opportunity to gain an insight into the lives of his workers. When Stephen refuses to reveal to Bounderby, information about his former companions, his moral conscience is highlighted. ;D
“He had not spoken out of his own will and desire; and he felt it in his heart a noble return for his late injurious treatment, to be faithful to those who had repudiated him.” ;D
Stephen chose not to defend his colleagues something missing?because he wanted to, but merely because it was the morally just action to take. Despite having been subjected, by his associates, to a enivronment in which he was segregated from the other workers, he remained ethically righteous, because it was a quality born unto him. Conversely, through Bounderby’s inquisition, he demonstrates his deficient moral understanding. When Stephen withholds the information he longs for, his bitter, unethical character is highlighted.
“Even your own Union, the men who know you best, will have nothing to do with you... I’ll have nothing to with you either.” ;D
Through the omniscient narration, it is assured Bounderby’s reaction is coming from an unbiased perspective is therefore entirely accurate. In Stephen’s refusal to present Bounderby with the information he sought after, he does the morally right thing, rather than catering to the pompous character’s custom of attaining whatever he wants. Bounderby’s decision to fire him when he does so, contrasts with Stephen’s display of morality, and thus demonstrates his lacking sense in ethical judgement. ;D His cruel treatment of Stephen once again illustrates Dickens’ use of pathos, as he prompts the audience? to empathise with the moral, working class. The omniscient narration allows for a distinct insight into both characters of differing social classes, and defines the upper class (Mr Bounderby) as the villain, and the working class (Stephen) as the honourable victim. ;DHow is the narrator used in the conclusion to highlight the idea of karma etc and ensuring that the villains receive what they deserve.
Oliver Twist is, too, narrated from an omniscient perspective in order to allow greater insight into the lives of varying characters.How is it used to show one boy's transformation and metaphorical and literal journey.The omniscient perspective rptallows the lives of all characters to be revealed, rather than the story being confined to the viewpoint of one individual. Consequently, the divide between the rich and poor is further highlighted as the hardships endured by the working class are contrasted with the ease of life for the aristocratic society. From a young age, Oliver was told he was destined for a life of illegitimate affairs and sinful actions. When he was no more than a mere child, an upper class gentleman outlined his view on Oliver’s life prospects by simply stating: ;D
“That boy will be hung.”
Through the omniscient perspective, the reader is not restricted to the viewpoint of the protagonist, and consequently the harsh opinions of this expression seems a little ambigous.the lower class are unveiled. As a working class member of society Oliver is branded as a callous character by the upper class, and is, in their eyes, undoubtedly destined to become an outlaw who will ultimately be hung for his sins. ;DDickens ridicules the uppity gentleman, through mocking their indignation at Oliver asking for more food. He describes Oliver’s actions to be an “impious and profane offence.” ;D Through this sarcastic description, Dickens conveyshow? the ridiculous nature of the upper class’ attitude towards those of a lesser social status.watch you don't just repeat yourself Through Oliver’s treatment, the social prejudices the working class were subjected to, are thoroughlydon't need thoroughly. highlighted. In conjunction with the upper class’ opinion of the working class being conveyed, Oliver’s opinion concerning the lifestyle of the aristocrats is also unveiled through the omniscient perspective. Having endured the hardship of staying in treacherous housing, Oliver is amazed by Mr Brownlow’s lifestyle. ;D
“Everything was so quiet, and neat, and orderly; everybody was kind and gentle; that after the noise and turbulence in the midst of which he had always lived, it seemed like Heaven itself.” ;D
Oliver evidently shows great gratitude for being granted permission to stay in Mr Brownlow’s home – a quality he was accused many times, by the upper class, not to possess. Mr Brownlow is depicted to a live a expression errorlife of ease and stability – greatly contrasting with Oliver’s unpredictable lifestyle. The adoration Oliver feels for Mr Brownlow differs immensely from the upper class’ superior attitudeexpression error before this insertion. towards the working class. Through the omniscient perspective in Oliver Twist, Dickens conveys the differing existences experienced by those of varying social status, and their attitudes towards one another.
Kirsten, this is not as bad as you believe it to be - you probably need to do a little bit more reading on narrative style in general and really develop a sound grasp of the styles so that you can expand beyond simple statements about non-biased etc - although this is relevant and correct it is important that you are able to move beyond this. You are able to relate all of your ideas back to the question and clearly write in a fluent and sophisticated manner. You are nearly there - don't give up.
Hope this helps. ;D
|
|
|
Post by kirsten (: on Apr 3, 2011 21:20:26 GMT
okay this is the great expos bit of the characterisation chapter (i'm easing you in) .. it's currently at 1,111 just for great expos so yeaaaahh.. oh and it also sort of trickles out towards the end.. HAVE FUN ;D
Throughout Dickens’ novels, the characterisation used allows for clear identification of the segregation between different social classes, and the detrimental effects the possession, or desire for, affluence can have. In Great Expectations the protagonist, Pip, is initially depicted to be the stereotypical working class young boy. He was named “Philip Pirrup” at birth by his parents, but dubbed “Pip” due to his inability to pronounce his full name. Pip’s incapability to articulate his own name, underlines his lack of education, and immediately establishes him as a working class citizen. As a lower class member of society, Pip is depicted to be subject to great discrimination and ill-treatment due to his low social standing. Upon his visit to Miss Havisham’s house, Pip endures great speculation from her adopted daughter, as to ‘common’ attire and demeanour.
“’What coarse hands he has! And what thick boots!’
I had never thought of being ashamed of my hands before but I began to consider them a very indifferent pair. Her contempt for me was so strong, that it became infectious and I caught it.” Estella’s evident disdain for Pip originates from the society in which she was brought up. Having been raised in the aristocratic society, to condescend and behave in a disrespectful manner towards the working class, was an accepted part of life. Due to her endearing beauty and intelligence, Pip is instantly fixated with gaining her approval. The character of Estella’s purpose in the novel is to fuel Pip’s aspirations and heighten his life expectations. Having met her, Pip is no longer content with his life, and seeks a life of greater social standing, so that he may circulate in her society and secure her admiration. However, as Pip ascends the social hierarchy he, too, adopts a superior attitude to the working class, and a severe change in the integrity of his character can be seen.
“I wanted to make Joe less ignorant and common, that he might be worthier of my society and less open to Estella’s reproach.”
After achieving great social success, Pip no longer appreciates the value of morality and principles. He is unable to see beyond Joe’s lesser social status and assess his character by his admirable integrity and has therefore evidently succumbed to the superficiality of the upper class.
The superficiality of the aristocratic society is further highlighted through the way in which the characters of Estella and Pip are spoken of. Having been both originated from working class backgrounds, but been adopted into the upper class society, they are spoken of, as if they are creations. Magwitch, Pip’s benefactor, speaks of Pip as if he were merely something he concocted, rather than a human being. He describes Pip to be “the gentleman what I made.” Similarly, Estella feels she is merely Miss Havisham’s creation - an object and not a human. Having been brought into Miss Havisham’s sinister world of hatred and anguish, she was taught not to feel, nor allow herself to love another. She is consequently left a cold, unfeeling creature, unable to empathise or feel compassion for others. She tells Miss Havisham “I am what you made me.” The way in which they are depicted as creations rather than humans, makes them appear like inanimate possessions – merely objects which exude upper class superiority due to their outward elegance and demeanour. Furthermore, the discontent a life fixated with the aristocratic values, is illustrated through these two characters. Estella shows great resent to Miss Havisham for her upbringing and her inability to love. Pip, too, is shown grasp the devastation his exposure to wealth brought to his life.
“I should have been decidedly happy and better if I had never seen Miss Havisham’s face, and had risen to manhood content to be partners with Joe in the honest old forge.”
Evidently, in hindsight Pip understands that the sanctity of his home was destroyed the moment he met Miss Havisham, and realised that other lifestyles were more desirable and thriving than his own. At this point it is confirmed that Pip finally comprehends that wealth does not ensure happiness.
The character of Joe remains consistent throughout the novel, with his sense of moral integrity remaining unwavering, even when mistreated by others. Although he is greatly less educated than Pip, he conveys a great sense of social understanding – a quality not seen in Pip, who is unable to see beyond his own desires. When Joe visits Pip in his new home in London, they endure an awkward evening as Joe is unable to adjust to his surroundings and become at ease with Pip’s opulent lifestyle. However, he demonstrates his social understanding when he explains the reason for their uncomfortable meeting.
“Pip, dear old chap, life is made of ever so many partings welded together, as I may say, and one man’s a blacksmith, and one’s a whitesmith, and one’s a goldsmith, and one’s a coppersmith. Diwisions among such must come, and must be met as they come.”
Through this description, Joe wishes to express to Pip, that it is their differing social statuses that have caused the uneasy atmosphere. Due to their diverse lifestyles, they are unable to interact in the same way as they previously could. He wishes Pip to comprehend that the great weight with which social status defines lives. Joe’s acceptance of their situation, and lack of resentment towards Pip’s ill treatment of him, illustrates Joe’s good natured character and his comprehension of the great influence of social status. Qualities possessed by Joe – such as his moral integrity – act as a way of contrasting his character with Pip. He is depicted to be distinctly more admirable than Pip – thus further illustrating Dickens’ argument, that money and all things honourable are not a guaranteed match.
The devastation caused by greed and longing for affluence, is further conveyed through the character of Miss Havisham. Miss Havisham, a once content woman, destined for a life of prosperity, was forced to endure the aftermath of the destruction greed and wealth had on her life. Having given herself to a man who, upon marrying her, schemed to procure all Miss Havisham’s money.
“Miss Havisham up town – an immensely rich and grim lady who lived in a large house barricaded against robbers, and who led a life of seclusion.”
Rather than being liberated by her wealth, Miss Havisham appears imprisoned by it. Due to her traumatic past, she no longer trusts her emotions and wealth with others, and consequently lives a life segregated from the rest of society – held captive by her riches. Evidently, through Miss Havisham’s character, Dickens successfully conveys the detrimental effects the possession, or longing for money can have.
|
|
|
Post by kirsten (: on Apr 4, 2011 19:39:56 GMT
oliver twist section of characterisation is 630 words so not as huuuuge as Great expos currently on 4,584 words though.. oh dear, still hard times characterisation and conclusion to go.. As in Great Expectations, the protagonist of Oliver Twist is of working class social status. He is however shown to possess greater moral righteousness than Pip. Through his character, Dickens conveys the plight of the working class, and even more so, the sinister experiences endured by working class children. Similarly to Pip, the name of the central character holds great significance. Due to his mother’s dying when she gave birth to him, Oliver was named by an employee of the work house. “We name our fondlings in alphabetical order. The last was a S, - Swubble, I named him. This was a T, - Twist, I named him. The next one as comes will be Unwin, and the next Wilkins. I have got the names ready made.” In that the names of the working class orphans were merely decided by the alphabet and the order in which they were born, Dickens conveys the poor circumstances in which they lived. This logical method of naming the children shows the workhouse employees brandishing them with utterly impersonal names. Oliver was mechanically named with little thought or compassion - illustrating the way in which he was thought of as little more than yet another working class orphan. However, the name “Twist” seems to reflects heavily upon his ever changing circumstances and social change. He endures the hardships of the working class lifestyle, but also enjoys intermittent periods of happiness, living with a family of upper class social status. His morality ultimately allows him to remain in the aristocratic society with Mr Brownlow, and ascend the social hierarchy. Through the outcome of Oliver’s fate, Dickens demonstrates the greater merit of morality over materialistic values. Oliver’s exposure to the sinister methods of attaining money, employed by some working class members of society, further underline the plight of working class children. Small sliver of wood generally used in fire-makingin – a lower class man, corrupted by his yearning for affluence – enrols young children to steal from the upper class. As Oliver observes him training the children, his naivety towards the reality of what they are doing is underlined. “The merry old gentleman and the two boys played a very curious and uncommon game.” Through Oliver’s oblivious attitude towards the reality of what they’re doing, Dickens conveys his naivety and young age. Through highlighting his childlike perception of life, Dickens conveys the way in which yearning for money can corrupt children. The children are evidently too young to be exposed to the harsh reality of society, and as Small sliver of wood generally used in fire-makingin encourages the children to steal, he thieves them of their childhood and innocent outlook on life. Conversely, Mr Brownlow is characterised as a morally just, upper class character. He is shown to be one of the few characters whose outlook on life is not confined to stereotypes concerning social standing. He judges others not by their wealth or riches, but instead by their compassion and ethics. “Mr Brownlow’s heart, being large enough for any six ordinary old gentleman of humane disposition, forced a supply of tears into his eyes.” Having been brought into a world where he was treated with the utmost disrespect and cruelty, Oliver is greatly touched by Mr Brownlow’s empathetic attitude towards Oliver. Through welcoming Oliver into his home, he is shown to have been unaffected by his affluence, and still capable of true human compassion. This is of great contrast to many of Dickens’ other characters, including the men at the workhouse. As Mr Bumble’s character is introduced, Dickens writes: “Mr Bumble was a fat man.” Through this depiction of Mr Bumble, Dickens conveys the gluttonous nature of his character and the other such workhouse employees. They are portrayed to be heavily self indulgent and greedy – contrasting with Mr Brownlow who is evidently caring and willing to share his riches with Oliver.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Apr 5, 2011 6:19:55 GMT
Throughout Dickens’ novels, the characterisation usedexpression 'used' is rather simplistic and weak. allows for clear identification of the segregation between different social classes, and the detrimental effects the possession, or desire for, affluence can haveis on society, a particular group or the indiviudual? ;D. In Great Expectations the protagonist, Pip, is initially depictedchange depicted. to be the stereotypical the expression at the end of this sentence is weak - can you join the two sentences together - this one and the next one as they are clearly linked.working class young boy. He was named “Philip Pirrup” at birth by his parentsbit in italics is not needed., but dubbed “Pip” due to his inability to pronounce his full name. Pip’s incapabilityshould it just be inability? to articulate his own name, underlines his lack of education, and immediately establishes him as a working class citizen. As a lower class member of society, Pip is depictedthis does not flow correctly. to be subject to great discrimination and ill-treatment due to his low social standing.
New paragraphUpon his visit to Miss Havisham’s house, Pip endures great speculation from her adopted daughtername her?, as to ‘common’ attire and demeanourthe end of the sentence doesn't make sense. Also what point are you trying to prove and how does it link in with your overall question?.
“’What coarse hands he has! And what thick boots!’
"I had never thought of being ashamed of my hands before but I began to consider them a very indifferent pair. Her contempt for me was so strong, that it became infectious and I caught it.”
Estella’s evident disdain for Pip originates from the society in which she was brought up. Having been raised in the aristocratic societyrephrase this to avoid rpt of society 'aristrocracy', to condescend and behave in a disrespectful manner towards the working class, was an accepted part of life. Due to her endearing beauty and intelligence, Pip is instantly fixated with gaining her approvalAlso mention how her mocking of him makes him question himself and he now, as a result aspires to be better..
New paragraphThe character of Estella’s purpose in the novelLook at the word order in this sentence is to fuel Pip’s aspirations and heighten his life expectationsshould read his expectations for life otherwise you are suggesting he thinks he may die soon.. Having met her, Pip is no longer content with his life, and seeks a life of greater social standing, so that he may circulate in her society and secure her admiration. However, as Pip ascends the social hierarchy he, too, adopts a superior attitude to the working class, and a severeis severe the strongest word here? change in the integrity of his character can be seenHow? You need context for your quotation - make point clear as well..
“I wanted to make Joe less ignorant and common, that he might be worthier of my society and less open to Estella’s reproach.”
After achieving great social success, Pip no longer appreciates the value of morality and principlesexpand, slightly, on how he now has different values.. He is unable to see beyond Joe’s lesserwak expression social status and assess his character by his admirable integrity and has therefore evidently succumbed to the superficiality of the upper class.
The superficiality of the aristocratic society is further highlighted through the way in which the characters of Estella and Pip are spoken ofavoid ending with 'of'.. Having been don't need 'been'both originated from working class backgrounds, but beenexpression error adopted into the upper class society, they are spoken of, as if they are creations. Magwitch, Pip’s benefactor, speaks of Pip as if he were merely something he concocted, rather than a human beingWhat does this hsow?. HeHe doesn't - Dickens does describes Pip to be “the gentleman what I made.” Similarly, Estella feels she is merely Miss Havisham’s creation - an object and not a human. Having been brought into Miss Havisham’s sinister world of hatred and anguish, she was taught not to feel, nor allow herself to love another. ;DShe is consequently left a cold, unfeeling creature, unable to empathise or feel compassion for others. ;DShe tells Miss Havisham “I am what you made me.” The way in which they are depicted as creations rather than humans, makes them appear like inanimate possessions – merely objects which exude upper class superiority due to their outward elegance and demeanour ;D. Furthermore, the discontent a life fixated with the aristocratic values, is illustrated through these two characters. Estella shows great resent to Miss Havisham for her upbringing and her inability to love. Pip, too, is shown grasp the devastation his exposure to wealth brought to his life.
“I should have been decidedly happy and better if I had never seen Miss Havisham’s face, and had risen to manhood content to be partners with Joe in the honest old forge.” ;D
Evidently, in hindsight expression error in opening.Pip understands that the sanctity of his home was destroyed the moment he met Miss Havisham, and realised that other lifestyles were more desirable and thrivingis thriving the best word in this context? than his own. At this point it is confirmed that Pip finally comprehends that wealth does not ensure happiness.
Make a clearer link to the previous paragraph.The character of Joe remains consistent throughout the novel, with his sense of moral integrity remaining unwavering, even when mistreated by others. ;D Although he is greatly lessexpression error educated than Pip, he conveys a great sense of social understanding – a quality not seen in Pip, who is unable to see beyond his own desires. ;D
New paragraphWhen Joe visits Pip in his new home in London, they endure an awkward evening as Joe is unable to adjust to his surroundings and become at ease with Pip’s opulent lifestyle. However, he demonstrates his social understanding when he explains the reason for their uncomfortable meeting.
“Pip, dear old chap, life is made of ever so many partings welded together, as I may say, and one man’s a blacksmith, and one’s a whitesmith, and one’s a goldsmith, and one’s a coppersmith. Diwisions among such must come, and must be met as they come.” ;D
Through this Refere to Dickensdescription, Joe wishes to express to Pip, that it is their differing social status that haveexpression error caused the uneasy atmosphere. Due to their diverse lifestyles, they are unable to interact in the same way as they previously couldIs this sentence prior to this comment not repeating the one before it.. He wishes Pip to comprehend thatthis is a non-sentence. the great weight with which social status defines lives. Joe’s acceptance of their situation, and lack of resentment towards Pip’s ill treatment of him, illustrates Joe’s good natured character and his comprehension of the great influence of social status. Qualities possessed by Joe – such as his moral integrity – act as a way of contrasting his character with Pip. He is depicted to be distinctly more admirable than Pip – thus further illustrating Dickens’ argument, that money and all things honourable are not a guaranteed match.
The devastation caused by greed and longing for affluence, is further conveyed through the character of Miss Havisham. ;D Miss Havisham, a once content woman, destined for a life of prosperity, was forced to endure the aftermath of the destruction greed and wealth had on her life. Having given herself to a man who, upon marrying her, schemed to procure all Miss Havisham’s moneyshe is... this sentence needs completed..
“Miss Havisham up town – an immensely rich and grim lady who lived in a large house barricaded against robbers, and who led a life of seclusion.” ;D
Rather than being liberated by her wealth, Miss Havisham appears imprisoned by it ;D. Due to her traumatic past, she no longer trusts her emotions and wealth with others, and consequently lives a life segregated from the rest of society – held captive by her riches. ;D Evidently, through Miss Havisham’s character, Dickens successfully conveys the detrimental effects the possession, or longing for money can have. ;D
Hope this helps. ;D
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Apr 5, 2011 6:29:18 GMT
As in Great Expectations, the protagonist of Oliver Twist is of working class social statusweak expression an obvious link to previous section.. These first two sentences need to be clearly joined.He is however shown to possess greater moral righteousness than Pip. Through hisweak expression character, Dickens conveys the plight of the working class, and even more so, the sinister experiences endured by working class children. ;D Similarly to Pip, the name of the central character holds great significance. Due to his mother’s dying when she gave birth to him, Oliver was named by an employee of the work housebut what is you point in looking at this? Needs to be clearer..
“We name our fondlings in alphabetical order. The last was a S, - Swubble, I named him. This was a T, - Twist, I named him. The next one as comes will be Unwin, and the next Wilkins. I have got the names ready made.” ;D
In that theexpression error names of the working class orphans were merely decided by the alphabet and the order in which they were born ;D, the second half of this sentences doesn't link.Dickens conveys the poor circumstances in which they lived. This logical method of naming the children shows the workhouse employees brandishing them with utterly impersonal namesand a total disgregard for their heritage etc?. Oliver was mechanically named with little thought or compassion - illustrating the way in which he was thought of as little more than yet another working class orphanwatch you don't just keep repeating the same point here.. However, the name “Twist” seemstry and avoid showing doubt. to reflects heavily upon his ever changing circumstances and social change. He endures the hardships of the working class lifestyle, but also enjoys intermittent periods of happiness, living with a family of upper class social status. His morality ultimately allows him to remain in the aristocratic society with Mr Brownlow, and ascend the social hierarchy. Through the outcome of Oliver’s fate, Dickens demonstrates the greater merit of morality over materialistic valuesas he....
Oliver’s exposure to the sinister methods of attaining money, employed by some working class members of society, further underline the plight of working class childrenopening sentence is a little wordy.. Small sliver of wood generally used in fire-makingin – a lower class man, corrupted by his yearning for affluence – enrols young children to steal from the upper class. As Oliver observes him training the children, his naivety towards the reality of what they are doing is underlinedHow?.
“The merry old gentleman and the two boys played a very curious and uncommon game.”
Through Oliver’s oblivious attitude towards the reality of what they’re doing, Dickens conveys his naivety and young age.seeing it merely as a game and his description of Small sliver of wood generally used in fire-makingan as Merry shows that he is unaware of the darker more sinister side to him. Through highlighting his childlike perception of life, Dickens conveys the way in which yearning for money can corrupt children. The children are evidently too young to be exposed to the harsh reality of society, and as Small sliver of wood generally used in fire-makingin encourages the children to steal, he thievesthieves is weak expression. them of their childhood and innocent outlook on life.
Conversely, Mr Brownlow is characterised as a morally just, upper class characterpolar opposites.. He is shown to be one of the few characters whose outlook on life is not confined to stereotypes concerning social standingthis last sentence seems a little to rigid and mechanical.. He judges others not by their wealth or riches, but instead by their compassion and ethics.Context for this quotation is needed.
“Mr Brownlow’s heart, being large enough for any six ordinary old gentleman of humane disposition, forced a supply of tears into his eyes.”
Having been brought into a world where he was treated with the utmost disrespect and cruelty, Oliver is greatly touched by Mr Brownlow’s empathetic attitude towards Oliver? rpt.. Through welcoming Oliver into his home, he is shown to have been unaffected by his affluence, and still capable of true human compassion. This is of great contrast to many of Dickens’ other characters, including the men at the workhouse. As Mr Bumble’s character is introduced, Dickens writes: “Mr Bumble was a fat man.” Through this depiction of Mr Bumble, Dickens conveys the gluttonous nature of his character and the other such workhouse employees. They are portrayed to be heavily self indulgent and greedy – contrasting with Mr Brownlow who is evidently caring and willing to share his riches with Oliver. ;D
Could do with a little bit more on Oliver - it all ends to abruptly - what happens to him at the latter stages of his journey?
HJope this helps. ;D
|
|
|
Post by kirsten (: on Apr 5, 2011 21:36:45 GMT
thanks for marking the rest.. this is hard times characterisation. i've only done two people (upper/lower class) because the word limit's getting awfully stretched oohhh and this is easily the worst bit yet In Hard Times, Stephen Blackpool is portrayed as an impoverished yet upstanding and moral citizen – contrasting heavily with the corrupt character of Small sliver of wood generally used in fire-makingin. He is one of the Hands employed at Mr Bounderby’s factory. Throughout the novel the Hands are referred to as a collective group – with little information provided for individual characters. The anonymity of the Hands illustrates the way in which they were viewed by the upper class. They were assumed to be of lesser importance and therefore not worthy of enquiries concerning their identities and lives. Throughout the novel, the only Hand whose personal life is uncovered is that of Stephen. Dickens therefore suggests that Stephen represents the Hands as a collective, and the hardships he faces are too endured by the other Hands. When he is dismissed from the factory, after not agreeing to attend to Mr Bounderby’s unethical requests, it appears Thomas Gradgrind wishes to help him. Being of the wealthier middle class, it seems he would be able aid Stephen, and instructs him to “hang about the bank for an hour or so.” He states that if he is able to produce a method that will help Stephen, he will meet him in the evening outside the bank. However, as the novel progresses it becomes evident that he has used Stephen, to prevent the truth about his robbery of the bank being uncovered. Due to Stephen’s noted appearance outside the bank on several occasions, he appears to be the culprit responsible for the theft. Thomas’ callous treatment of Stephen further illustrates the insignificance of the working class to the middle class. He sacrifices Stephen for his own self, underlining the merciless treatment the aristocratic and bourgeoisie societies dealt to the working class. Mr Bounderby epitomises such cruel, upper class members of society portrayed in Dickens’ novels. He recurrently recounts his life story and the hardships he faced as a child. Claiming to have been abandoned by his mother, he narrates his life story as one of great suffering, in which he had to behave with great diligence to attain the lifestyle he now enjoys. He professes to be a self made man – heightening his self worth and egotistic manner. He describes his workers to be “a set of rascals and rebels”, declaring that their impoverished circumstances are due to their own lethargic attitudes – showing little empathy for their financial situation. When speaking of his workers he continues to refer to his own childhood and the success he achieved though his hard work. However, as the novel draws to a close, Mr Bounderby’s mother is introduced, and the reality concerning his childhood is unveiled. When questioned about her treatment of him, and his accusations that she abandoned him in a gutter, she is evidently appalled. “’Josiah in the gutter!’ exclaimed Mrs Pegler. ‘No such a thing sir. Never! For shame on you! My dear boy knows and will give you to know, that he come of humble parents, he come of parents that loved him as dear as the best they could.’” At this point in the novel it becomes clear that Mr Bounderby was adored by his parents and the reality of his childhood experience was incomparable to the tale he recounted. It is uncovered that Mr Bounderby had banished his parents from his life so that he may proclaim self made success. Due to his false persona and history, the merit of his upper class social status is consequently diminished. His superior attitude to the working class is no longer justified and the severity of his unjust treatment of them is further highlighted.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Apr 6, 2011 6:40:08 GMT
In Hard Times, Stephen Blackpool is portrayedcharacterised as an impoverished yet upstanding and moral citizena quotation here would be perfect. – contrasting heavilycreating a strong contrast with... with the corruptand... character of Small sliver of wood generally used in fire-makingin. He is one of the Hands employed at Mr Bounderby’s factory. Throughout the novel the Hands are referred to as a collective group – with little information provided for individual charactersthe expression and language after the dash is rather weak.. The anonymity of the Hands illustrates the way in which they were viewed by the upper class. your sentence structure here is a little abrupt and interferes with the flow of the piece. Watch you don't overdo the use of short sentences.They were assumed to be of lesser importance and therefore not worthy of enquiriesseems a little bit vague. concerning their identities and lives. Throughout the novel, the only Hand whose personal life is uncovered is that of Stephen. Dickens therefore suggests that Stephen represents the Hands as a collective, and the hardships he faces are too endured by the other Hands. ;D First impressions of Stephen?When he is dismissed from the factory, after not agreeing to attend to Mr Bounderby’s unethical requestswhat does this suggest about class? His refusal to be corrupt etc?, it appears Thomas Gradgrind wishes to help him. Being of the wealthier middle classweak expression in the opening of this sentence., it seems he would be able aid Stephen, and instructs him to “hang about the bank for an hour or so.” He states that if he is able to produce a method that will help Stephen, he will meet him in the evening outside the bank.the sentence before this comment seems to be rather simple and also just plot telling. However, as the novel progresses it becomes evident that he has used Stephen, to prevent the truth about his robbery of the bank being uncovered. Due to Stephen’s noted appearance outside the bank on several occasions, he appears to be the culprit responsible for the theft. Thomas’ callous treatment of Stephen further illustrates the insignificance of the working class to the middle class.these two sentences should be more concise and then joined into one. He sacrifices Stephen for his own self, underlining the merciless treatment the aristocratic and bourgeoisie societies dealt to the working class. This needs more about Stephens moral substance - how does he show dignity and nobility? Also greater use of references - quotations - from the text.
Where is the link?Mr Bounderby epitomises suchuse of such doesn't quite fit. cruel, upper class members of society portrayed in Dickens’ novels. He recurrently recounts his life story and the hardships he faced as a childWhy?. Claiming to have been abandoned by his mother, he narrates his life story as one of great suffering, in which he had to behave with great diligence to attain the lifestyle he now enjoys ;D. He professes to be a self made man – heightening his self worth and egotistic manner. ;D He describes his workers to be “a set of rascals and rebels”, declaring that their impoverished circumstances are due to their own lethargic attitudes – showing little empathy for their financial situation ;D. When speaking of his workers he continues to refer to his own childhood and the success he achieved though his hard work.You need more on his mistreatment of the lower classes - The Handsan example? However, as the novel draws to a close, Mr Bounderby’s mother is introduced, and the reality concerning his childhood is unveiled. When questioned about her treatment of him, and his accusations that she abandoned him in a gutter, she is evidently appalled.ensure you use colons before introducing each quotation.
“’Josiah in the gutter!’ exclaimed Mrs Pegler. ‘No such a thing sir. Never! For shame on you! My dear boy knows and will give you to know, that he come of humble parents, he come of parents that loved him as dear as the best they could.’”
At this point in the novel itweak expression in the opening. becomes clear that Mr Bounderby was adored by his parents and the reality of his childhood experience was incomparable to the tale he recounted. It is uncovered that Mr Bounderby had banished his parents from his life so that he may proclaim self made success. ;DDue to his false persona and history, the merit of his upper class social status is consequently diminished. His superior attitude to the working class is no longer justified and the severity of his unjust treatment of them is further highlighted.What is Dickens saying about the upper class?
Hope this helps. ;D
|
|
|
Post by kirsten (: on Apr 6, 2011 21:01:06 GMT
redrafting is not going well.. i'm now over 800 words over aaaaaaaahhh
|
|